Between Rhetoric and Research: A Critical Analysis of Media Skeptics’ Scientific Claims on Paranormal Phenomena
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66589/j26m9k19Keywords:
Media skepticism; Scientific legitimacy; Epistemology of science; Parapsychology; Paranormal research; Peer reviewed publications.Abstract
The text examines the public stance of media-visible skeptics who present themselves as scientific authorities on paranormal topics, questioning the gap between their claimed expertise and the actual rigor of their scientific output. By comparing their visibility, awards, and publication venues with those of researchers who genuinely investigate exceptional experiences using empirical methods, the analysis highlights how much media skepticism relies on rethorical performance rather than substantive scientific contribution. The contrast helps clarify the real epistemic value of each group's work and distinguishes genuine research from public posturing.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright of their work while granting Parawize Journal the right to publish the article as part of the journal.
Authors are responsible for ensuring that they have permission to reproduce any copyrighted material included in their manuscript, including images, figures, tables, or other reproduced content.
By submitting a manuscript for publication, authors confirm that the work is original and that they hold the necessary rights to grant publication of the material.
Articles published in Parawize Journal may be distributed in accordance with the journal’s open access policies. Proper citation of the original publication must be maintained whenever the work is reproduced or referenced.
